Ignasi Forcano vs Andriy Poritskyy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the last six months, Forcano has demonstrated superior performance on their second serve, winning 43.18% of points compared to Poritskyy's 33.82%. Could this indicate an advantage for Forcano in upcoming matches? Indeed, it appears to be a positive indicator.
• Regarding return games, Forcano has been more effective, capturing 46.03% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Poritskyy trails at 30.68%. In first serve returns, Forcano also leads, winning 27.57% against Poritskyy's 22.87%.
• Under pressure, Forcano has saved a higher percentage of breakpoints at 51.38%, compared to Poritskyy's 43.48%, suggesting stronger mental resilience during critical game moments.
• Analyzing overall performance, Forcano shows a higher win rate with 59.68% of matches won in the last year, surpassing Poritskyy's 48.15% win rate, providing an overall edge for Forcano.
• Surface preferences show Poritskyy excelling on hard courts with a 44% win rate, yet Forcano dominates indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, favoring different surfaces.
• In their respective playing levels, both players have mostly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, but Forcano has attained more success, reflecting in their higher win percentage.
• Assessment of opponent quality ranks Poritskyy higher, facing more challenging competitors with an average rank of 10.59 compared to Forcano's opponents at 156.71. However, this has not translated into superior overall performance.
• In deciding sets, Poritskyy holds a significant advantage, winning 67% of these matches, whereas Forcano has won only 40%, highlighting Poritskyy's strength in crucial moments.
• Poritskyy shows a weaker breakpoint conversion at just 20%, while Forcano capitalizes on 31.75% of opportunities, an important factor during high-pressure points.

Editorial Prediction (September 16, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze recent performance statistics, it's evident that Forcano holds a notable edge in several crucial areas. Their second serve effectiveness surpasses Poritskyy's by a significant margin, suggesting Forcano's ability to maintain control over service games.

Furthermore, Forcano excels in return games, both on first and second serves, indicating a well-rounded skill set that could disrupt Poritskyy's service rhythm. When it comes to handling pressure, Forcano's superior breakpoint saving percentage indicates resilience, crucial during tight match situations.

Despite Poritskyy's higher success rate in deciding sets, Forcano's overall match win rate and breakpoint conversion suggest a higher likelihood of clinching critical points. Additionally, Forcano's adaptability, particularly on indoor hard courts, might provide an extra advantage on their favored surface.

In conclusion, given Forcano's stronger recent performance statistics, including serving, returns, and conversion abilities, they are more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match against Poritskyy.